Capitulation Nation?

Sometimes I wonder about our country. I wonder how we can let ourselves be stuck in the situations we find ourselves and not speak out, or vote out the people responsible.

I see the government getting ready to provide massive bailouts to the banking industry as they foreclose on homeowners who made ill-advised borrowing decisions based on unsound lending practices, and I know that we will let it happen.

I see a war in Iraq that we actually had some passion about for while, but that was few months ago and now we are pretty much rolling over on that one too.

I see a government that tramples civil rights and practically laughs in the face of feeble attempts at oversight, while a legislative maneuver delays the FISA bill so the passion will recede on that too. And we go along with it.

We have the most expensive health care system in the world, by far, and for all that money we get mediocre systemic care and record corporate profits.

We have the largest carbon footprint in the world, we undermine attempts to address global warming internationally, and we have record, all-time record, corporate profits.

We have an emerging mercenary military force with hired thugs who rape, detain and threaten female soldiers, and are paid ten times what enlisted American soldiers are paid, and their parent corporations are making obscene profits on no-bid contracts.

We have an education system increasingly obsessed with testing and an accountability system designed to lead us to privatization and more opportunities for corporate profits, at the expense of our children's education.

We have a tax code that has been manipulated to the advantage of the wealthiest 1% of individuals in this country, while working people and the middle class have seen wages stagnate.

We have trade agreements that benefit multi-national corporations, and in return we get lead in our toys.

So, have I become "angry" or "shrill" yet?

Does calling someone angry make any of this more easy to dismiss or capitulate to?

I have seen John Edwards 4 times in person over the past year, and I have never heard him be anything that I would call "angry". Just passionate, which we need. He is the only one who is willing to lay these problems out for everyone to see clearly and the only one who is willing to take these problems on directly on behalf of the American people. Clinton will not. Obama will not. To think or claim otherwise is to ignore every bit of evidence from his actions and words in this campaign, and in his previous legislative track record of avoiding divisive issues. It's practically his campaign motto that he won't be divisive.  

When members of Congress voted to extend the Iraq war, or allow unwarranted wiretapping, or open up access to sweatshop labor markets or any of the many other actions that we may find unfathomable from Democrats especially, I bet they had their own justifications; that this was bipartisan, they were not being divisive or shrill, and gosh, all the mainstream papers were in favor of it. And they can sleep at night apparently. And they will be reelected mostly.

And nothing will change if Democrats, and Democratic voters, capitulate yet again.



Display:


Re: Capitulation Nation? (none / 0)

Greenstar,

You have reached a raw nerve in our society that perhaps, most people either ignore or don't see on their radar screen.

If creatures from outer space had been observing us for the past 150 years they might wonder among themselves, what went wrong?

They would have seen us enter the Industrial Revolution and marvel at the rapid creation of wealth by people like the Vanderbilts, Carnegie's Rockefeller's. Mellon's, and later, the Ford family.

Prior to the Industrial Age when our people worked as farmers,tradesmen and shopkeepers, the numbers seeking public office were hardly more than a limited few. There was good reason for this as the pay was poor and it meant being away from home for long periods of time. Anyone entering the political arena would have done so as a patriotic calling and for no other reason.

Suddenly this all changed with the Industrial revolution and the increased economic activity that accompanied it. After all, the new nation now had the responsibility of providing for the movement of raw materials/finished products and the job fell to the government. As with the great monarchies of Europe, it was always the custom for anyone needing favor to petition the ruler.
Getting a petition approved generally required gifts and gratuity. Most everyone knew about he practice but did nothing about it.

Today, we have lobbyists who perform the work of seeking favors. Our laws specifically forbid elected officials to accept gifts or gratuities in excess of nominal amounts. As Americans, we
prefer to believe in the honesty, integrity and sincerity of those we elect.

With today's field of entrants, only John Edwards
has made an issue of fighting big-business interests. It remains yet to be seen how well he does in his first primary during the next two weeks. Unfortunately, his poll numbers indicate his message may be mostly falling on deaf ears.

Poor Ben's Journal


by PoorBensJournal on Sat Dec 22, 2007 at 01:10:44 AM EST

Re: Capitulation Nation? (none / 0)

Ben, you were doing great until that last section!

The polls seem to show that Edwards should win Iowa, unless there is an enormous, unprecedented turnout because of his firm support and strong second preference standing. Hard to figure things in those caucuses but that's the interpretation I have come away with after reading all the analysis.

If he wins Iowa, takes between 5-10 points from the other 2, and gets 2/3's of the remaining undecided in NH, he wins there too. This is a very conservative expectation of the "bump" for the Iowa winner based on the track record.

So I believe, with my head and not just my heart, that Edwards is VERY much still in this race, and I think it's important that voters not have the perception that he has no chance until that actually comes to pass, if it does.


by greenvtster on Sat Dec 22, 2007 at 09:47:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Capitulation Nation? (none / 0)

greenvtster
(sorry for getting your webname wrong 1st time)

I am glad to hear that John Edwards' numbers have moved up so dramatically in Iowa and NH.

Back to your Capitulation Nation:
I would hope, somehow, you can get the Edwards' people to read your moving commentary and maybe take a few notes and use them immediately.

Back to John Edwards:
In my opinion, John hasn't come across well on the debates. He sounds too rehearsed and his style
lacks forcefulness. I believe John has to become much tougher. He's got to convince the public that he is genuine, sincere and above all, he must act the part of a crusader and then put some fire under his crusade. He should take some cues from FDR's campaign speeches. FDR's personna was that of a gentleman and a statesman. and not a politician. When FDR spoke to the public, he was brief and to the point. He spoke to the common man and woman, knowing their needs and telling them what he would do. Finally, FDR would never use the phrase, "when I am president". This is a definite turn-off to most undecided voters, especially if it's only for the primary.

Anyway, if John Edwards gets the nomination, he will need to develop a tougher, less political and more statesman-like veneer.

Poor Ben's Journal


by PoorBensJournal on Sun Dec 23, 2007 at 03:24:49 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.